Difference between revisions of "Code of Conduct"
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
(Based on Queensland Government Article, see link below) | (Based on Queensland Government Article, see link below) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Typical starting points == | ||
| + | All groups are sooner or later riddled by by challenges when collaborating as a group. At Leuphana University, group works are from the very first semester part of the DNA of our teaching, since group work is indeed a realistic setting for later work reality. There are clearly positive and negative aspects one wants to cover when working on out a code of conduct. Let us start with all factors that make working in a group great, as collected from our students: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Diverse ideas, different backgrounds and experience, reliability and splitting of the workload, giving each other critical feedback and emotional support are mentioned when people perceive group work to be positive. However, all these experience can be flipped into loosing time to gain coherence, endless feedback loops, lack of trust, unreliable work ethics, loss of energy due to repetitions, and the whole array of negative emotions we humans are capable of. This includes people's egos dominating the group, unbalanced speaking time, and lack of inclusion. Power does indeed quite often play a major role in group works, and this is also difficult to get rid of. The best way to start getting a great group together is obviously to start with yourself. How much do you listen to other? Do you give others appropriate space? How are your moderating skills? Do you make a conscious effort of integration? Can you uplift the spirits in the groups. Do you provide structure and are reliable? Are there specific behaviours of others that trigger you, and can you get rid of this counter-behaviour? Do you make an active effort to learn from the other? This list can go on for a long time, and is one of the best arguments why a code of conduct only works if you are committed to it. You cannot expect others to honour something that you ignore. We all make mistakes, yet keeping a research diary and learning how to serve a group best is a lifelong goal. A code of conduct is like a list of virtue driven guidelines that you may built in your life in order to facilitate yourself within groups. In academia many people are impatient, a trait probably all of us shared at times. Yet trying to push other people around will not help in the long run. Perfecting patience is hence a key skill. If you add reliability and awareness of your own insecurities -which are often the root cause of your triggers- then you are already halfway there. Almost the whole rest concerning group work is about trust, and this can only be built or earned, but not planned. | ||
== Links & Further reading == | == Links & Further reading == | ||
| Line 85: | Line 90: | ||
[[Category:Team Size 30+]] | [[Category:Team Size 30+]] | ||
| − | The [[Table_of_Contributors| author]] of this entry is Julius Rathgens. | + | The [[Table_of_Contributors| author]] of this entry is Julius Rathgens (+ Henrik von Wehrden about staring points). |
Revision as of 13:10, 19 June 2022
| Type | Team Size | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collaborative Tools | Software | Personal Skills | Productivity Tools | 1 | 2-10 | 11-30 | 30+ |
What, Why & When
What: The Code of Conduct is a written statement used in different circumstances to formalize the working procedures and expectations of individuals in a specific team. "A code of conduct is a set of rules outlining the norms, rules, and responsibilities or proper practices of an individual party or an organisation (Wikipedia)."
Why: It is oftentimes used in companies to set out certain rules and the respective responsibilities of their employers and employees and can be used to hold both accountable for their actions. It is usually laid out in a written format.
When: Ideally a Code of Conduct is created before the intentional formation of a specific team. This helps to explicitly clarify the expectations, roles and responsibilities of each individual. As many organizations change over time this Code of Conduct should be iterated frequently to prove if it still fits the purpose of the team. Long term working environments benefit the most from a Code of Conduct (e.g. PhD-Supervision, Work in an association, Employee contracts, long term student assistants, long term group work)
Caution
As the creation and maintenance of a formalized code of conduct takes a lot of time and effort, it is questionable if it is needed for every form of group endeavour (e.g. group essays, non-regularly meetings). However, it is still valuable to think in terms of code of conducts as every individual should be held accountable for their actions.
Goals
A Code of Conduct provides clear Statements on how individuals want to work together in a specific organization. The Goal of the Code of Conduct can be summarized under the following three aspects: (1) Unity (2) Standards (3) Direction
1. Unity: Certain ethical rules should be abided by everyone (e.g. letting everyone be heard, respecting each others arguments, being accountable)
2. Standards: It should be clarified what the ethical standards and procedures within an organization should be in order to provide every individual with explicit procedures on how to behave.
3. Direction: Should provide each individual about the purposes and goals of the organization to provide guidance on each respective role within that collective endeavor.
Getting started
The creation of a Code of Conduct should incorporate two aspects. (1) The topical points (2) procedural points
1. Topical points to include in your Code of Conduct
- ethical principles - includes workplace behaviour and respect for all people
- values - includes an honest, unbiased and unprejudiced work environment
- accountability - includes taking responsibility for your own actions, ensuring appropriate use of information, exercising diligence and duty of care obligations and avoiding conflicts of interest
- standard of conduct - includes complying with the job description, commitment to the organisation and proper computer, internet and email usage
- standard of practice - includes current policies and procedures and business operational manual
- disciplinary actions - includes complaints handling and specific penalties for any violation of the code.
2. procedural points for creating and iterating your Code of Conduct
Make sure everyone within the organization is able to express their opinion on roles, responsibilities and expectations. These questions could help for starting an open discussion about organizational values and how to formalize them:
- What does ethics mean to you?
- How effectively does the business put its values into practice?
- Can we improve our ethical performance?
- What do you think of the draft ethical guidelines?
- Would this code of conduct help you make decisions?
- How could it be more helpful?
- Is there anything else we should include?
(Based on Queensland Government Article, see link below)
Typical starting points
All groups are sooner or later riddled by by challenges when collaborating as a group. At Leuphana University, group works are from the very first semester part of the DNA of our teaching, since group work is indeed a realistic setting for later work reality. There are clearly positive and negative aspects one wants to cover when working on out a code of conduct. Let us start with all factors that make working in a group great, as collected from our students:
Diverse ideas, different backgrounds and experience, reliability and splitting of the workload, giving each other critical feedback and emotional support are mentioned when people perceive group work to be positive. However, all these experience can be flipped into loosing time to gain coherence, endless feedback loops, lack of trust, unreliable work ethics, loss of energy due to repetitions, and the whole array of negative emotions we humans are capable of. This includes people's egos dominating the group, unbalanced speaking time, and lack of inclusion. Power does indeed quite often play a major role in group works, and this is also difficult to get rid of. The best way to start getting a great group together is obviously to start with yourself. How much do you listen to other? Do you give others appropriate space? How are your moderating skills? Do you make a conscious effort of integration? Can you uplift the spirits in the groups. Do you provide structure and are reliable? Are there specific behaviours of others that trigger you, and can you get rid of this counter-behaviour? Do you make an active effort to learn from the other? This list can go on for a long time, and is one of the best arguments why a code of conduct only works if you are committed to it. You cannot expect others to honour something that you ignore. We all make mistakes, yet keeping a research diary and learning how to serve a group best is a lifelong goal. A code of conduct is like a list of virtue driven guidelines that you may built in your life in order to facilitate yourself within groups. In academia many people are impatient, a trait probably all of us shared at times. Yet trying to push other people around will not help in the long run. Perfecting patience is hence a key skill. If you add reliability and awareness of your own insecurities -which are often the root cause of your triggers- then you are already halfway there. Almost the whole rest concerning group work is about trust, and this can only be built or earned, but not planned.
Links & Further reading
Youtube Videos:
Quick youtube explanation of a code of conduct
Blogs:
Important aspects of a code of conduct
Guide to writing a code of conduct
Pro's and Con's of a code of conduct
Peer Reviewed Articles:
Doig & Wilson (2002): The Effectiveness Of Codes Of Conduct
The author of this entry is Julius Rathgens (+ Henrik von Wehrden about staring points).
