Difference between revisions of "Intercoder reliability"
From Sustainability Methods
(Created page with "<!-- Creating & Categorizing the article --> <!-- there is no button to create a new page - just type https://sustainabilitymethods.org/index.php/ into the URL bar and add th...") |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Example: --> | Example: --> | ||
| − | <!-- The next paragraph aims at a short overview what the following article is about. | + | <!-- The next paragraph aims at a short overview what the following article is about. --> |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ''' In short:''' Intercoder reliability is a fundamental aspect of good Content Analysis, meaning that different researchers code the same material and their results are cross-referenced. This can help identify discepancies in how each coder interprets the material, and highlights the importance of a clearly defined and transparently communicated codebook. By cross-referencing the coding results, the research team can slam on the brakes and order a re-iteration of the codebook, the coding instructions, and the coding process. On | ||
| + | |||
| + | <!--the flipside, a negligence of this intercoder evaluation can enforce any of the biases mentioned in this article. When only one or few coding results are created, especially for ambiguous data sources, the synthesized results can be highly influenced by these few perspectives.--> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| − | |||
| Line 26: | Line 47: | ||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == | ||
| − | |||
<!-- The following creates a table with 3 rows and 4 columns (phase, step, description, output). | <!-- The following creates a table with 3 rows and 4 columns (phase, step, description, output). | ||
| Line 37: | Line 57: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | + | The table below displays an '''ideal-typical process''' of the ''XYZ''. | |
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Latest revision as of 10:42, 23 May 2024
In short: Intercoder reliability is a fundamental aspect of good Content Analysis, meaning that different researchers code the same material and their results are cross-referenced. This can help identify discepancies in how each coder interprets the material, and highlights the importance of a clearly defined and transparently communicated codebook. By cross-referencing the coding results, the research team can slam on the brakes and order a re-iteration of the codebook, the coding instructions, and the coding process. On
Contents
Introduction
The table below displays an ideal-typical process of the XYZ.
| Header text | Header text | Header text | Header text |
|---|---|---|---|
| Example | Example | Example | Example |
| Example | Example | Example | Example |
| Example | Example | Example | Example |
| Example | Example | Example | Example |
What the method does
Strength and challenges
Normativity
Outlook
Key publications and References
According to Chicago Style conventions
The author of this entry is Max Mustermann.
